ganesha-rados-cluster-design - Man Page

This document aims to explain the theory and design behind the rados_cluster recovery backend, which coordinates grace period enforcement among multiple, independent NFS servers.

In order to understand the clustered recovery backend, it's first necessary to understand how recovery works with a single server:

NFSv4 is a lease-based protocol. Clients set up a relationship to the server and must periodically renew their lease in order to maintain their ephemeral state (open files, locks, delegations or layouts).

When a singleton NFS server is restarted, any ephemeral state is lost. When the server comes comes back online, NFS clients detect that the server has been restarted and will reclaim the ephemeral state that they held at the time of their last contact with the server.

In order to ensure that we don't end up with conflicts, clients are barred from acquiring any new state while in the Recovery phase. Only reclaim operations are allowed.

This period of time is called the grace period. Most NFS servers have a grace period that lasts around two lease periods, however nfs-ganesha can and will lift the grace period early if it determines that no more clients will be allowed to recover.

Once the grace period ends, the server will move into its Normal operation state. During this period, no more recovery is allowed and new state can be acquired by NFS clients.

The lifecycle of a singleton NFS server can be considered to be a series of transitions from the Recovery period to Normal operation and back. In the remainder of this document we'll consider such a period to be an epoch, and assign each a number beginning with 1.

Visually, we can represent it like this, such that each Normal -> Recovery transition is marked by a change in the epoch value:

+-------+-------+-------+---------------+-------+
| State | R | N | R | N | R | R | R | N | R | N |
+-------+-------+-------+---------------+-------+
| Epoch |   1   |   2   |       3       |   4   |
+-------+-------+-------+---------------+-------+

Note that it is possible to restart during the grace period (as shown above during epoch 3). That just serves to extend the recovery period and the epoch. A new epoch is only declared during a Recovery -> Normal transition.

There are some potential edge cases that can occur involving network partitions and multiple reboots. In order to prevent those, the server must maintain a list of clients that hold state on the server at any given time. This list must be maintained on stable storage. If a client sends a request to reclaim some state, then the server must check to make sure it's on that list before allowing the request.

Thus when the server allows reclaim requests it must always gate it against the recovery database from the previous epoch. As clients come in to reclaim, we establish records for them in a new database associated with the current epoch.

The transition from recovery to normal operation should perform an atomic switch of recovery databases. A recovery database only becomes legitimate on a recovery to normal transition. Until that point, the recovery database from the previous epoch is the canonical one.

Let's consider a set of independent NFS servers, all serving out the same content from a clustered backend filesystem of any flavor. Each NFS server in this case can itself be considered a clustered FS client. This means that the NFS server is really just a proxy for state on the clustered filesystem.

The filesystem must make some guarantees to the NFS server. First filesystem guarantee:

1.

The filesystem ensures that the NFS servers (aka the FS clients) cannot obtain state that conflicts with that of another NFS server.

This is somewhat obvious and is what we expect from any clustered filesystem outside of any requirements of NFS. If the clustered filesystem can provide this, then we know that conflicting state during normal operations cannot be granted.

The recovery period has a different set of rules. If an NFS server crashes and is restarted, then we have a window of time when that NFS server does not know what state was held by its clients.

If the state held by the crashed NFS server is immediately released after the crash, another NFS server could hand out conflicting state before the original NFS client has a chance to recover it.

This must be prevented. Second filesystem guarantee:

2.

The filesystem must not release state held by a server during the previous epoch until all servers in the cluster are enforcing the grace period.

In practical terms, we want the filesystem to provide a way for an NFS server to tell it when it's safe to release state held by a previous instance of itself. The server should do this once it knows that all of its siblings are enforcing the grace period.

Note that we do not require that all servers restart and allow reclaim at that point. It's sufficient for them to simply begin grace period enforcement as soon as possible once one server needs it.

At this point the cluster siblings are no longer completely independent, and the grace period has become a cluster-wide property. This means that we must track the current epoch on some sort of shared storage that the servers can all access.

Additionally we must also keep track of whether a cluster-wide grace period is in effect. Any running nodes should all be informed when either of this info changes, so they can take appropriate steps when it occurs.

In the rados_cluster backend, we track these using two epoch values:

C: is the current epoch. This represents the current epoch value

of the cluster

R: is the recovery epoch. This represents the epoch from which

clients are allowed to recover. A non-zero value here means that a cluster-wide grace period is in effect. Setting this to 0 ends that grace period.

In order to decide when to make grace period transitions, each server must also advertise its state to the other nodes. Specifically, each server must be able to determine these two things about each of its siblings:

1. Does this server have clients from the previous epoch that will require recovery? (NEED)
2. Is this server enforcing the grace period by refusing non-reclaim locks? (ENFORCING)

We do this with a pair of flags per sibling (NEED and ENFORCING). Each server typically manages its own flags.

The rados_cluster backend stores all of this information in a single RADOS object that is modified using read/modify/write cycles. Typically we'll read the whole object, modify it, and then attempt to write it back. If something changes between the read and write, we redo the read and try it again.

In rados_cluster the client recovery databases are stored as RADOS objects. Each NFS server has its own set of them and they are given names that have the current epoch (C) embedded in it. This ensures that recovery databases are specific to a particular epoch.

In general, it's safe to delete any recovery database that precedes R when R is non-zero, and safe to remove any recovery database except for the current one (the one with C in the name) when the grace period is not in effect (R==0).

When a server restarts and wants to allow clients to reclaim their state, it must establish a new epoch by incrementing the current epoch to declare a new grace period (R=C; C=C+1).

The exception to this rule is when the cluster is already in a grace period. Servers can just join an in-progress grace period instead of establishing a new one if one is already active.

In either case, the server should also set its NEED and ENFORCING flags at the same time.

The other surviving cluster siblings should take steps to begin grace period enforcement as soon as possible. This entails "draining off" any in-progress state morphing operations and then blocking the acquisition of any new state (usually with a return of NFS4ERR_GRACE to clients that attempt it). Again, there is no need for the survivors from the previous epoch to allow recovery here.

The surviving servers must however establish a new client recovery database at this point to ensure that their clients can do recovery in the event of a crash afterward.

Once all of the siblings are enforcing the grace period, the recovering server can then request that the filesystem release the old state, and allow clients to begin reclaiming their state. In the rados_cluster backend driver, we do this by stalling server startup until all hosts in the cluster are enforcing the grace period.

Transitioning from recovery to normal operation really consists of two different steps:

1. the server decides that it no longer requires a grace period, either due to it timing out or there not being any clients that would be allowed to reclaim.
2. the server stops enforcing the grace period and transitions to normal operation

These concepts are often conflated in singleton servers, but in a cluster we must consider them independently.

When a server is finished with its own local recovery period, it should clear its NEED flag. That server should continue enforcing the grace period however until the grace period is fully lifted. The server must not permit reclaims after clearing its NEED flag, however.

If the servers' own NEED flag is the last one set, then it can lift the grace period (by setting R=0). At that point, all servers in the cluster can end grace period enforcement, and communicate that fact to the others by clearing their ENFORCING flags.